The game has changed?

I haven’t spent much time updating the blog. Been very, very busy. Lots going on at the day job, the Army job, and the night-time writer job. Good things happening all around. So much so that I’m being forced to pick and choose how I spend my hours, because there really isn’t enough time in the day to get all of the important, worthwhile stuff done, and have minutes left to burn on blogging. Still, I wanted to do a general update, if only because I’ve got a lot on my mind concerning what’s been happening lately.

Last week I was down at the bottom of Utah learning from one of the great teachers in Science Fiction and Fantasy: Dave Wolverton. Dave has his fingerprints all over the careers of several dozen professional writers, including Brandon Sanderson and Stephanie Meyer. Dave’s genius lies in the fact that he has an uncanny grasp of story — the psychology and emotional underpinnings of what makes a blockbuster stand apart from average or even good novels. He’s also the guy who, as judge for Writers of the Future, sent me priceless personal feedback on my very first Finalist in the Contest. That story, “Outbound,” eventually went on to sell to Analog Science Fiction & Fact, as well as Esli magazine (Russia) and is still paying dividends — some of which I’ll be able to discuss in a couple of months once the news is officially public.

Basically, Dave knows what the hell he’s talking about.

So when I appealed to him — in some degree of frustration — about my repeated failures with novel-length projects, Dave said, “Come on down, I’ve got just the workshop for you.” And I was not disappointed.

But first, a bit of background…

As a discovery writer who writes all of his short fiction in the make-it-up-as-you-go mode, outlining for stories has always felt like an artificial and inhibiting process. Part of the magic of writing — for me — has always been that even I don’t know what happens next. I may have a general idea of where I’m headed, but for the most part I’m uncovering fresh soil as I move along. And the outlining process — the few times I’d tried it — destroyed my enthusiasm. Such that when I got done outlining a book project, I no longer felt the rush of excitement to write the book. Because I already knew in my mind what happens and how it all works out. And what’s the fun in that?

But discovery writing at lengths beyond 20,000 words is its own form of hell. I have four different current projects I’ve tried to tackle in the last 18 months and all of them have been enormously frustrating — because stories that long involve so many characters and so many different plot threads, it feels almost impossible to keep track of them. Much less keep them all moving forward with the necessary degree of action and emotional oomph that’ll keep readers interested. I was facing the very real possibility of losing these projects the way I’ve lost too many books in the past, and I’m rather sick and tired of spending months getting a book completed, only to be unhappy with finished product.

Dave Wolverton’s outlining workshop was revelatory. Suddenly I am seeing how to have my cake and eat it too. I can keep the magic of the discovery phase and the tightness and coherency necessary for the structure phase. And I can do it with an eye towards deeper emotional resonance with a broader audience. Something I am afraid I may have been unconsciously shying away from in past novels, if only because I’d gotten stuck on the idea that being very, very different was the key to standing out. When in fact, as Dave pointed out, difference is just the superficial first step. Like frosting on a cake. In order for readers to arrive at the final page of a novel and feel like it was a worthwhile journey, there have to be certain promises made and fulfilled along the way. There are very good reasons why mega-books like Stephanie Meyer’s novels sell in the numbers that they do. And it’s got nothing to do with the prettiness or delicacy or art of the prose. It’s all about story. Story is king. Beautiful language all by itself is meaningless without story. Story is the difference between “small” books that sell a few hundred or thousand copies, and “big” novels that sell millions. Marketing cannot sustain a poorly-storied novel, while an excellently-storied novel can become a blockbuster even with very little push from the publisher.

So, I am diving back into my projects with renewed enthusiasm — and the realization that I’ve got a lot of renovation to do. Like an episode of This Old House. I know what the projects look like — on the outside. But I’m going to have to do some ripping up and tearing out on the inside, with an eye towards reinforcing certain characters, certain plot lines, and certain themes. And if I do it in the top-level outline form — where discovery writing can remain free — it’s far, far easier than trying to do it in re-writing, where whole chapters have to be scrapped, and it can often be maddening trying to re-link chunks of a book back together using entirely new chapters or passages. Which may or may not be coherent with the whole, and which may or may not completely change the tone and pacing of the project. Which is what I’d often wound up doing in the past, and eventually gave up on when it became apparent that the book had become a mess.

So huge thanks to Dave Wolverton for opening my eyes to a new level of long-length storytelling. For those of you who have done Dave’s classes — click here to see all of Dave Wolverton’s workshops — I am sure you know what I mean. Anyone else who’s still interested? I’d say Dave’s workshop was as valuable for me as anything I’ve ever done, including the Lincoln City workshops with Kris Rusch and Dean Smith. It was time and money well spent, and I look forward in a few years to pointing to my books and saying, “Dave Wolverton taught me how to do this!”

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “The game has changed?

  1. Day job and Army job? Wow. What do you do out yonder in the real world?

    You make me really want to take one of Dave’s writing seminars! Since I’m not planning on going to WorldCon in 2012, maybe I’ll funnel the money towards one of those…

  2. Dave’s class was very good. We went down deep on the basic “myth” structure of story-telling. I haven’t ever done a workshop where we went that deep on the mythic aspects of the big novels and the big movies: the ones that make millions. Dave is definitely not a “small” writer. He’s all about telling big stories and having big audience appeal, and he’s got boatloads of eye-opening wisdom on this. I felt it was absolutely worthwhile.

    As for the three jobs: I am a geek for the healthare sector, a geek for the Army Reserve — in the form of a Warrant Officer — and a night-time writer geek. Sleep? Days off?? I can’t remember what those are anymore. (he he)

  3. Brad, I didn’t realize that you were a discovery writer, too. Wow. If anyone had asked my opinion, I’d have said that you planned meticulously, especially in regards to Outbound.

    Your mention of Dave’s workshop brings up a question: I’ve never been able to work from an outline myself-my brain just sort of shuts down when I try-how was Dave’s workshop different? I get the concept of reinforcing themes and emotional resonance but I usually can’t plan that stuff ahead. Not that I want you to divulge everything (you can if you want, I won’t stop you ) but it’d be interested to get your feedback.

    Thanks,

    Steve

  4. Yup, I am a discovery writer. Planning stories has always been a very frustrating process for me, as described in the original post. “Outbound” was 100% discovery-written. I’ll take it as a compliment that it comes out planned. (grin) It’s impossible to properly describe what goes on in Dave’s class. What he focuses on are the fundamental elements of Big Story: how the blockbusters novels (and movies) rake in the fans and the bucks, versus “small” books and movies which, while interesting or even well-done, don’t hit off well with a broad audience. Towards this end the outline became, not so much an exercise in “containering” as much as an exercise in key-point verification. Making sure that as the story progressed that all the collective elements contributed meaningfully to the gradual escalation of the story towards an ultimate and satisfying crescendo, with appropriate and satisfying denouement. In the past, when I’ve tried to free-write along these lines, it’s almost seemed futile because I had no framework nor roadmap. I’d always treated such things as hindrances. But, under Dave’s guidance, the actual process became much, much more clear for me. I feel rather liberated.

  5. I discovery write. I really think I need to outline at least a little. Thanks for bringing this up. Dave was great at LTUE, I think I’ll have to check out his classes.

  6. Good to hear about Dave’s workshop. I’m off to his Professional Writers Workshop in June, and I can’t wait. Like you, I’ve been struggling with novels. I’ve written two from beginning to end, but most end up around the 30,000 to 40,000-word mark before I give up. I don’t call these novels unfinished … just put on hold, indefinitely. What will probably end up happening is that I take bits and pieces from them for new, fresh projects. And I’m really, really hoping that Dave’s PWW will help. After reading your post, I’m sure it will.

  7. Dave really does have an uncanny grasp of his subject matter. He’s soft-spoken and doesn’t hammer you with a hard-line doctrine, but if you go to his classes with what Dean Smith calls an “empty cup” you will be surprised at how much wisdom you’re able to soak up. Having met Dave for the first time in 2009, and having seen him at conventions and at Superstars, I thought his class was a whole other level of learning — above and beyond the already good stuff he normally puts out.

  8. Sigh. I hope he does more next year… This year is eaten up by other things for me. Grr.

    I’m glad you had such a good experience. Now…go forth and FINISH THAT NOVEL. 😉

  9. Thanks for the reminder that I was planning to attend his seminar in Salt Lake next weekend. I totally forgot until I read this. Time to get babysitting worked out …

    Good luck with your projects. I know exactly what you mean about how difficult it is to write a longer piece of fiction. In college, I had a specific writing method: think about the topic, choose a thesis, research, think, think, think, think until the entire thing was basically just sitting in there in my head, ready to come out. I have ALWAYS been a One Draft kind of girl. My motto has been, “If it has to be revised, I obviously just didn’t spend enough time thinking about it before I began…”

    But writing a novel? An entire novel? I’m sorry, but it just can’t all fit inside my head at the same time. If it can, it’s a crappy novel and not nearly intricate enough to make me interested in writing it. So I’m discovering my own balance of structuring and plotting and then writing in chunks that CAN fit in my head. And, worst of all, I’m becoming familiar with this thing called “revision.” We aren’t friends yet, but we’re getting there.

  10. Hey Brad,
    Good post — ironically I just stepped in from jogging and was listening to a Dave Wolverton interview on Adventures in SciFi. You talk about each minute being precious, and I use exercise and driving back and forth to work as writing podcast/lectures time (and an occasional audiobook).

    And yes, I am in the middle of a complete rewrite myself. Thankfully, it’s a middle grade novel (heroic fantasy), so the word count will be lower than an adult novel, but I attribute this rewrite due to a lack of my own experience. I wish I could make it to Utah for one of Dave’s writing camps, but it is not in the cards right now. I’m trying to find some local (Michigan) workshops to go to.

    Good luck on your wip!

  11. So many workshops, so little time. I’m with Annie, I might try and get to one next year depending on budget and time.

    How’s the penance from Kris coming along?

  12. Pingback: For your browsing pleasure– « Gods, Witches, Space & Stars

Comments are closed.